How to Get More Out of Your Tools: Chip Thinning, Kellering & High Feed Milling
08.10.2020 · Kennametal ·
Teilen:
·
Drucken
https://okt.to/O4xqPV
In this webinar, Kennametal experts Danny Davis & Steve George share machining best practices and solutions for demanding aerospace and general engineering applications. Our experts continue the discussion on chip thinning, kellering and high feed milling. You can use these tips to achieve higher MRR, better finishes and faster cycle times.
Leave us a comment below and let us know what you want to learn about in an upcoming webinar.
Register for upcoming webinars to watch live: https://okt.to/LJba4v
1:32 - What do we mean by kellering?
2:42 - History behind kellering
4:21 - Surface finish: Cusp Height, Stepover & Radius
6:50 - 3D model demonstration
8:19 - The importance of radial & axial chip thinning
11:51 - Forward tilt on a ball nose end mill
19:29 - What can we do to get an acceptable cusp height but take bigger stepovers?
21:41 - Using a corner radius tool
25:43 - Is it also effective to tilt on Swiss machines with live tools using a ball nose when machining the sphere on the face of a part?
26:50 - High feed forces (KenFeed & 7792)
29:37 - Advantage of radius when kellering / how changing shape will affect it
34:38 - Flexion of the tool
36:08 - Equation for cusp height based on the end radius of the tool and stepover . If H is your desired cusp height, R is the radius of your end face, and of course ae is your stepover, then H = R - SQRT(R^2 - (ae/2)^2)
36:48 - Question: Would an indexable high feed mill be applicable for CNC machines that have multiple strokes on one machined part?
39:12 - How to program these high feed cutters
40:55 - Application example
43:37 - YouTube Question: Is it possible to talk (and show) a bit more about how you measure the temperature, tool load, all that. Do big machine shops do that type of measurement in-house to improve the productivity or do they usually ask you to go there and help out?
53:47 - Increasing spindle speed with a lower radial depth-of-cut / lower engagement angle
57:12 - Heat flux
Teilen: · Drucken